Re: Perl issues
Vincent Renardias <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I think perl-base should not be Essential, since it will be replaced
> anyway once the installation completes. "perl" should be essential though.
> (Or can "essential" packages be replaced by dpkg?)
I think maybe you misread the proposal. Under the scheme proposed
(which seems like the right one), perl will no longer replace
perl-base, but supplement it. In such a scenario, it's perfectly OK
for perl-base to be essential.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .