Re: list of bashisms
In article <email@example.com>,
Andy Mortimer <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> There has just been a long list of bugs against packages using `bashisms'
> in their scripts, and I can certainly remember this issue coming up
> before. But I don't know about anyone else, but I certainly have no idea
> what features are available in the `original sh'.
Lots. The small handful of features that are in bash and not in ksh93 should
not be used, but I can't see any reason to stay compatible with ten year old
versions of sh when the posix standard isn't exactly new anymore.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .