Re: aclocal ?
On 10 May 1997, Klee Dienes wrote:
> > Why is this package in experimental? Should I be careful about something?
> So far as I know, only because the upstream authors consider it
> not-yet-stable, and have asked that it not be widely released.
Similar situation to Debian's unstable vs. stable - they don't want too
many people to be tracking the target, so that they can move it easily
without causing disaster.
> In my experience it is significantly more useful and more reliable
> than the current 'released' version, with only a few minor problems
> that are easy to work around. There may of course be problems I don't
> know about, though.
I totally agree.
Tom Lees <email@example.com> http://www.lpsg.demon.co.uk/
PGP ID 87D4D065, fingerprint 2A 66 86 9D 02 4D A6 1E B8 A2 17 9D 4F 9B 89 D6
finger firstname.lastname@example.org for full public key (also available on keyservers)
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .