Re: aclocal ?
> Why is this package in experimental? Should I be careful about something?
So far as I know, only because the upstream authors consider it
not-yet-stable, and have asked that it not be widely released.
In my experience it is significantly more useful and more reliable
than the current 'released' version, with only a few minor problems
that are easy to work around. There may of course be problems I don't
know about, though.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .