Re: g++ and libc6
> On May 7, Rob Browning wrote
> > I just wanted to check to make sure that this just means that we need
> > a libc6 version of libg++, and that I don't just have something else
> > misconfigured.
> Yes, we need a libg++ for libc6 but there isn't any at the moment.
> H.J. Lu has some patches for an unreleased version of libg++-2.8 but I
> don't think it would be wise to use them in a distribution just yet.
Does that mean I needn't try to compile libg 126.96.36.199 with libc6?
joost witteveen, email@example.com
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .