[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ircii_EPIC3.004-1



'Mark Baker wrote:'
>
>In article <199705012257.SAA14060@unix3.netaxs.com>,
>	Chris Fearnley <cjf@netaxs.com> writes:
>
>> Another option is to get the upstream to incorporate patches that make
>> the EPIC changes run-time options to the standard ircii.
>
>Not much chance of that I think. If they wanted to do that they would have
>done so years ago.

Well, have you asked them?  This is a social engineering problem:  how
to increase cooperation among freeware developers.  Sometimes it takes
someone from a neutral camp to try to negotiate a merge.  I am simply
sugesting that this is a good idea.  If it fails or if you don't want
to take the initiative, I could live with yet another ircii package.
I was hoping to inspire someone to try to merge the two efforts.

-- 
Christopher J. Fearnley          |  Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com                   |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf       |  Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf  |  "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: