[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package organization issue...

'Dale Scheetz wrote:'
>On 26 Apr 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
>> Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net> writes:
>> > Third:This is really just a personal request. I think that mc should be
>> > 	part of standard. This would bring libgpm1 into standard as well.
>> I like mc, too, but it's not got any claim at all to being standard.
>> It'd a DOS-ism applied to Unix.
>How do we decide something like this?

Or should git be standard?  I think it will take a few more years
before mc or git is standard enough to be standard.

Christopher J. Fearnley          |  Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com                   |  Design Science Revolutionary
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf       |  Explorer in Universe
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf  |  "Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller

TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .

Reply to: