[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Package organization issue...



>>>>> "Dale" == Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net> writes:

    Dale> On 26 Apr 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
    >> Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net> writes: > Third:This is really
    >> just a personal request. I think that mc should be > part of
    >> standard. This would bring libgpm1 into standard as well.
    >> 
    >> I like mc, too, but it's not got any claim at all to being
    >> standard.  It'd a DOS-ism applied to Unix.
    >> 
    Dale> I understand that mc started life as a clone of the DOS tool
    Dale> of similar name, but today it is far more than a simple
    Dale> window philosophy. Its virtual file systems, the ftp file
    Dale> system in particular, make it a well integrated Unix
    Dale> tool.

 I like mc a lot too.  It is an invaluable tool for anyone working on
a text console, with or without a mouse.  With it one can view files,
see the way through the directory hierarchy, and manipulate ownership
and permissions in an easy-for-a-beginner to understand way.  It
formats manual pages very nicely.  If Lynx is installed, it will use
it on a pipeline to format html to be viewed.  It can look inside .deb 
package files, tar files, and rpm's.

 I also suggest that the shell function shown in mc's help screen be
added to the "/etc/profile" file (and exported there) by `mc`s
installation scripts.

-- 
Karl M. Hegbloom <karlheg@inetarena.com>
http://www.inetarena.com/~karlheg
Portland, OR  USA
Debian GNU 1.2  Linux 2.0.30t


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .


Reply to: