Re: Removing Packages from Hamm (was: Can we upload binaries using libc6 to hamm yet?)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 23 Apr 1997, Brian White wrote:
> > Brian, after libc6 being installed in unstable, will you report a zillion
> > bugs against all packages requiring a recompile? [ This would also serve
> > as a developer-ping ].
>
> I wonder if it's worth removing _everything_ from binary-(arch) within hamm
> until it gets re-uploaded again. We'd then disallow all packages that
> depend on libc5.
Wow! This would be really strong, IMHO.
I see this more like the "conversion to new format" issue. True, we should
have ideally all packages working under libc6 by the time Debian 2.0 is
released, but not at the price of making hamm unusable.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBM14yMyqK7IlOjMLFAQE5kQQAtWU4EkK91rWDRm2y9msKYbPfeoXhQmo7
pR9z4l4iH5jTwAtA4xC29qRaxus8SJOaIz91S/qPO9M6eJAnhBAeFhVjJJEOJ0FD
FuUfq8huPpCMjC7B94FvYDwRBUAhGVYjLXtKE2DNhczBked2i7aU4PQqtwg8bpY5
g6gSejkDmRc=
=QNIz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: