[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: deblint, anyone?

Christoph <debian@waterf.org> writes:

> Most of the proposed checks are already in debmake. I can add some
> functionality for those things that are missing. The code is there it just
> needs to be extracted from the "debstd" tool and made work on a binary
> package I guess.

I'm very much in the minority here, but I haven't yet gotten around to
making my packages use debmake.

Is it too much work to make the checks in a seperate binary, deblint,
which is in the debmake package?  If most of the checks are made
during build, then it's too much work, so don't bother.


TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com

Reply to: