Re: deblint, anyone?
Christoph <debian@waterf.org> writes:
> Most of the proposed checks are already in debmake. I can add some
> functionality for those things that are missing. The code is there it just
> needs to be extracted from the "debstd" tool and made work on a binary
> package I guess.
I'm very much in the minority here, but I haven't yet gotten around to
making my packages use debmake.
Is it too much work to make the checks in a seperate binary, deblint,
which is in the debmake package? If most of the checks are made
during build, then it's too much work, so don't bother.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: