Re: dselect thoughts
On Thu, Jan 23 1997 16:01 +1100 Stuart Lamble writes:
> firstname.lastname@example.org (Vociferous Mole) wrote:
> >The existing dselect structure (access, update, select, install,
> >configure, remove) is not bad, and I don't see why we can't just
> >add an alternative select module.
> Well, that's what I was going to do: write an alternative dselect
> with a different select module (basically everything else would've
> been the same.) Based on this, and the other comment about preferring
> the current setup, I think I'll modify dselect to have an alternative
> selection scheme. (Oh, joy...I don't particularly enjoy working with
> C++. :) My C++ tends to be mostly C, with _some_ C++ features - like
> classes.. but definitely none of that cin/out bogosity :)
I agree; if dselect wasn't written in C++ I had taken a look at it...
David Frey <email@example.com> |Microsoft isn't the answer...it's the
Schlieren, Switzerland |``No'' is the answer.
51F35923114FC8647D05FF173C61EFDE|Use Debian GNU/Linux!
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com