Re: Should wg15 be splitted?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Clarification: I said:
> If we allow Debian maintainers to change *anything* in the i18n packages
> (including messages), then we *definitely* would need Debian translation
> teams.
This does not mean I like the idea of allowing Debian maintainers to
change messages of GNU i18n programs...
In the meantime, it would be good to add something to the policy manuals
saying something like: "If you have to change a message given by a GNU
i18n program, please, think of it twice, because we would have to change
also the translations, and we do not currently have a right procedure to
do that".
Fortunately, Galen seems to be already following this (not-yet-written)
policy...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: latin1
iQCVAwUBMuue/iqK7IlOjMLFAQE5EwP/QBUsZ4jmuVaJBxCEed1bFnS7Q+mPiuOQ
5GHbRu/kawkE3Ck7ppPMXpo1w5AdnY2usiez4PuOSmlce+8GD+aNY/mGxbI8PvHi
dTY0PiRsUXNnRHYgnZQCPdpOqkDiFkBWguO9RbKlDPsY7qoLg/pAz5gC/nY0q+mW
Bf4RHgHiglQ=
=1uH8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: