[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problems with 1.2.1



On 11 Jan 1997, Kevin Dalley wrote:

> Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> writes:
> 
> > 
> > On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > So perhaps we should change the policy for package releases in the
> > stable-fixed distrib: There should be at least 3 people reviewing the
> > newer versions and only if they agree, they could be included in the next
> > release.
> > 
> 
> Review by one person who likes to say "no" is better than what we have
> now.
> 
> I suggest that any upload which is planned for stable or frozen
> requires a justification for being placed in stable or frozen.  If it
> doesn't fix a critical and submitted bug, that upload should be
> rejected.  That means that a developer-discovered bug for stable and
> frozen must be submitted.

But IMHO we need someone other than the maintainer to do the review. Just
mentioning some bug fixes in the changes isn't enough justification! At
least a second person has to agree with the upload.


Thanks,

Chris
--          _,,     Christian Schwarz
           / o \__   schwarz@monet.m.isar.de, schwarz@debian.org,
           !   ___;   schwarz@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de, bm955877@muenchen.org
           \  /        
  \\\______/  !        PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7  34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
   \          /         http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
  "DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com


Reply to: