[ Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list. ] Andreas Jellinghaus: > a) somebody recommended to have unstable-2.1 or somthing like that for > programms that require kernel 2.1 That name is misleading. It sounds like "version 2.1 of unstable", which it is not. A name like "unstable-for-kernel-2.1" would be better. However, I think it would be better to wait until 2.1 matures a bit, especially since this affects very few packages. Putting the few packages into experimental might be a better idea. > b) somebody recommended to split non-free and contrib into unstable and > stable sections. I agree with this change. Guy? -- Please read <http://www.iki.fi/liw/mail-to-lasu.html> before mailing me. Please don't Cc: me when replying to my message on a mailing list.
Description: PGP signature