Re: shlibs on library packages
On Sun, 15 Dec 1996, Stuart Lamble wrote:
lamble >>libfoo1 (>=1.2.0-0) (<<1.3.0-0)
lamble >
lamble >Why? I'd be just as happy to see it just have a dependancy like
lamble >
lamble >libfoo1 (>= 1.2.0-0)
Exactly right! Thanks for correcting the knots in my thinking.
Perhaps we could generally have dpkg-shlibdeps generate those kind of
dependencies?
i.e.
dependencies on libc5 would be
libc5 (>=5.4.0-0)
--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---
PGP Public Key = FB 9B 31 21 04 1E 3A 33 C7 62 2F C0 CD 81 CA B5
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: