Re: Glibc Packaging Issues
Bruce Perens wrote:
> From: david@elo.sw.ods.com (David Engel)
> > I wasn't aware that H.J. was going to distribute a version. I thought
> > he was only going to help test and maintain it for Linux. Wasn't the
> > main point of going to glibc was to have one version maintained by the
> > FSF?
>
> OK. Then it's the glibc2 package, and the 2 doesn't match the soname, and
> I guess we can live with that.
Isn't it critical that we coordinate the soname with other Linux distributions
to avoid incompatible binaries? It seems like H.J. could tell us (and others)
what soname to use to avoid problems.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: