Re: 2.1.X Kernels
Christoph Lameter writes:
> - ibcs not working
This one definitely cannot work. It doesn't even compile under 2.1.*.
> Of course these are all heavily dependant on special kernel features. The
> regular packages I guess will not be a problem. But I wonder how I should
> handle 2.1.X. Shall I make a packageX for each package like I have done
> with bridge and bridgex?
How about having two modules in each package, one that installs into
/lib/modules/2.0/<whatever> and one that installs into
Michael Meskes | Projekt-Manager
email@example.com | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
firstname.lastname@example.org | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! | 52146 Wuerselen
This message was delayed because the list mail delivery agent was down.