Re: libc5 policy decision
'Guy Maor wrote:'
>Philippe Troin <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Now, the question is, should we rebuild all packages so that they
>> link with 5.4.7, or will 5.2.18 be ok ?
>No, that isn't necessary.
>> And what is the list of packages which break under 5.4.7 ?
>netscape, octave, gnuplot. I can most likely fix the last one.
We should fix octave, gnuplot before release (they are important). We
should prominently state that netscape breaks but a workaround is
provided in /usr/doc/libc5/buggy-software. But I'm feeling much better
about 5.4.7 and am testing it on my home system today ...
NOTE: Red Hat 4.0 reportedly breaks Netscape too (same issue shared
libs). I haven't been to Red Hat's errata page to see what workaround
they came up with.
Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | Design Science Revolutionary
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Explorer in Universe
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com