Re: The Future of Debian's TeX packages
'Helmut Geyer wrote:'
>
>As most of the advanced packages of NTeX are generally not needed (and a
>small documentation file containing information on how to get TeX macros
>from the CTAN network should be easy to write), I'm in favour of
>the teTeX package.
>NTeX has one major adavntage, it includes XeT--TeX (for left to right
>languages), JTeX (japanese support)and support for Klingon, all
>which isn't supported by teTeX at all.
If it's easy for other package maintainers to add things like XeT--Tex
and etc (as I'm sure it is), then TeTeX does sound the more appealing.
And the ANNOUNCE says it's more recent that what we have now!
--
Christopher J. Fearnley | Linux/Internet Consulting
cjf@netaxs.com, cjf@onit.net | UNIX SIG Leader at PACS
http://www.netaxs.com/~cjf | (Philadelphia Area Computer Society)
ftp://ftp.netaxs.com/people/cjf | Design Science Revolutionary
"Dare to be Naive" -- Bucky Fuller | Explorer in Universe
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: