Re: new kernel/boot builders (fwd)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Simon Shapiro, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
>> > Thanks for your reply. I think we could deal with _more_than_one_ person
>> > who builds kernels and boot floppies. It's OK to build with 486 optimization
>> > if none of those optimizations break the 386 - is that still the case?
BTW, if we release the more recent kernel. We *must* release it with
the patches to deal with the large ping attack. (Takes any 1.3.x, 2.0.x
system down.) We should also probably include the SYN resistant
patches.
I can post a set of patches that will apply cleanly to a 2.0.23 kernel
source tree.
Darren
- --
<torin@daft.com> <http://www.daft.com/~torin> <torin@debian.org> <torin@io.com>
Darren Stalder/2608 Second Ave, @282/Seattle, WA 98121-1212/USA/+1-800-921-4996
@ Do you have your clothes on? I probably don't. Take yours off. Feel better. @
@ Sysadmin, webweaver, postmaster for hire. C/Perl/CGI programmer and tutor. @
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBMnAx9I4wrq++1Ls5AQHVVgP9FQCd6sGL3xYQWwgpW3ZRJSJSQh+zXhRO
EmGoKj2D84KDRdhKbpLpeSQ8T872nhpKndhVK1E8wL/0v9UfnwHOy97zUxVxFf4F
HMS8FIrWPr3K0NqRQPbLF2p6ttlz5y/5tuxB5Dw2a5ZJwskaH9XS53NcZItrg3Ny
jKJncIXexuM=
=H4YY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: