Re: Repost: POSIX 1387.2 (package-management)
On Thu, 10 Oct 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> I've heard that RPM and DPKG are far superior to POSIX packages.
-----\ don't you think its best to make your own opinion by reading
it first ? I can tell you for distributed packagemanagement the
X/Open-paper has many things to say. (This I guess from their topics-list)
> So far, nobody is asking for them in the way they are asking for
> POSIX.1 compliance, other than to say "have you heard of this,
> or did you know this existed"?
Granted, but wouldn't it be nice to have one common
packagemanagment-standard agreed by industry & GNU etc.?
> If we ever had to do so, we could provide a POSIX package tool to
> conform to the standard,
and rpm and ... and ...
> however we probably would not ever want to
> use it as our primary package tool.
Michael Gaertner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com