dpkg 1.4.0.2 and others - my comments
Thanks re most of that: the version comparison fixes look good to me,
as does the reversal of the quoting change in dpkg-buildpackage and
the various typo fixes, and the change to dpkg-buildpackage's passing
of options.
Your deoctify function looks buggy to me; I don't think splitting on \
is the right thing to do. What if (for example) the string happens to
start with digits ? I think you should do something like:
$out='';
while ($in =~ m/\\(\d{3})/) { $out.=$`.oct($1); $in=$'; }
$out.=$in;
Re your comment in the dpkg-buildpackage manpage about
gain-root-command having spaces. ATM it gets broken into separate
command and arguments according to the overly complicated shell
globbing rules, but I can see that this might change if (for example)
dpkg-buildpackage ever becomes a shell or Perl script. Hence the
imprecation not to do that.
Re Juergen Menden's problems with rc?.d not existing: well Don't Do
That Then. I don't consider this a bug in dpkg, and will close #4584
when I get around to it. I don't think that workarounds should be
added for this. If rc?.d directories don't exist then things will
break anyway, for example when update-rc.d is run.
Thanks to those who answered Dirk Eddelbuettel's bug #4729, that
dpkg-buildpackage is happy to build a package without a Depends line.
I agree that this is sensible and that the bug should be closed.
Ian.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com
Reply to: