Re: underscores
> So if I'm creating a new gimp package (a bug fix in the README.1st), I
> assume that I leave the package names the way they are (gimp (virtual),
> gimp-dmotif and gimp-smotif), and just use whatever dpkg-name thinks
> is the right name?
Yes, nothing has changed yet. I would not suggest that anyone create a
package name that contains an underbar - we'll deal with the 5 or 6
that do contain underbars after the release.
> Also, the current version depends on libgr, but we're supposedly
> phasing that out in favor of individual lib{png,tiff,jpeg,...}. Is
> that now or after 1.1? i.e. what should I use for this gimp package?
I don't know a thing about this.
Thanks
Bruce
--
*** Re-elect Clinton ***
Bruce Perens AB6YM Bruce@Pixar.com http://www.hams.com/
Reply to: