Re: Inclusion of kernel version in kernel package names: A followup
email@example.com (Guy Maor) wrote on 15.05.96 in <Pine.SOL.3.91.960515141441.21969Efirstname.lastname@example.org>:
> On Wed, 15 May 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote:
> > If the argument you are strengthening is that it is a mistake to build
> > your own kernel without using lilo.conf, I disagree.
> Perhaps you should reread my original post.
> Your unmet expectations are exactly why you shouldn't mix custom
> installed kernels with debian prepackaged kernels.
Perhaps you should reread the post you just quoted.
It clearly explains why mixing those _has_ to do the right thing.