[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Inclusion of kernel version in kernel package names: A followup

On Wed, 15 May 1996, Guy Maor wrote:

> I was under the impression that the image packages were only for the
> user who doesn't want to be troubled with configuring and compiling his
> own kernel.
> As such, I think it's a waste of time to make the scripts cover every
> contingency.  No matter how safe your script, Manoj, it will do
> horrible things to some user's unexpectedly weird setup.  Instead the
> image packages should clearly state their intended audience.
> I think it's also a mistake, Dale, to install your own kernels with
> your own lilo.conf and still expect kernel images that you've installed
> to work.

There must be a typo here. My point was that I don't use lilo at all! I
use loadlin. As a result looking a lilo.conf doesn't tell you what kernel
I run.



------------                                          --------------

aka   Dale Scheetz                   Phone:   1 (904) 877-0257
      Flexible Software              Fax:     NONE 
      Black Creek Critters           e-mail:  dwarf@polaris.net

------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------

Reply to: