Re: Incoming directory status
Torin/Darren/Who Ever... wrote:
> I haven't heard anything since including what should go into perl-base.
> I see three options:
> 1) Leave the packages split the way they are. Only 1 complaint isn't
> bad.
> 2) Put the subsidiary perl packages into the main perl package. That's
> almost 1.4 Meg additional for stuff the casual perl user doesn't
> need/want.
> 3) Some other suggestion that someone comes up with.
>
> I like #1 the best but I'll go along with what's chosen...
I would prefer to have a "normal" perl package with the normal perl
stuff + suid-perl and a separate perl_debug package (which most
people don't need).
Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter Tobias EMail:
Fachhochschule Ostfriesland tobias@et-inf.fho-emden.de
Fachbereich Elektrotechnik und Informatik tobias@debian.org
Constantiaplatz 4, 26723 Emden, Germany
Reply to: