Re: Packages in wrong location?

[Ian Jackson <ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk>]

Mark Eichin writes ("Re: Packages in wrong location?"):
> Umm, without setserial, I (and many others I'm sure) can't get up on
> the net... it's run by default, it should stay in base. I agree about
> setterm, though, that's just user convenience.

Ah, OK.  In that case it ought to be in `Section: base' and on the
base disks (which I assume are the same thing), but with `Priority:
Important' or `Standard', and not marked Essential.

Shall I report the fact that it is marked Essential as a bug ?

Ian.