Re: libpam [was: Re: Shadow question]

To: Patrick.Weemeeuw@kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be
Cc: debian-devel@Pixar.com (Debian Developer Mailing List)
Subject: Re: libpam [was: Re: Shadow question]
From: david@eos.lugs.ch (David Frey)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 00:08:52 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-id: <[🔎] m0uAOMK-000AIiC@eos>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199604190746.JAA29325@amber.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be> from "Patrick Weemeeuw" at Apr 19, 96 09:46:07 am

Hi Patrick,

Patrick> The biggest chunk of work however is adapting all the client programs
Patrick> to use libpam,

Well, if you do that, making them shadow-aware on thy fly would be "gratis",
since you have to look at them anyway [you can't assume that everybody has
libpam installed]

David
-- 
David Frey <david@eos.lugs.ch>|Microsoft isn't the answer...it's the QUESTION.
Schlieren, Switzerland        |``No'' is the answer.
PGP-Key available on request  |Use Debian GNU/Linux!

Reply to:

References:
- libpam [was: Re: Shadow question]
  - From: Patrick Weemeeuw <patrick@kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#2713: new /etc/passwd has corrupt entry for 'nobody'
Next by Date: Bug#2723: syslogd was built with bad libc
Previous by thread: libpam [was: Re: Shadow question]
Next by thread: Re: Shadow question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread