dchanges-3.0-0: are we not to use this?
I am in the process of building newer versions of my packages
(to meet the beta schedule), and dchanges was, umm, problematic. It
insisted on the new double-hyphen separators (easily fixed), and the
architecture name as part of the file name (also fixable). Also, the
usage message does not match internals )overide ps=blah should say
pri=blah). Should these be bug reports, or have I managed to pick up
an unsipported version?
A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still. --
Manoj Srivastava Systems Research Programmer, Project Pilgrim,
Phone: (413) 545-3918 A143B Lederle Graduate Research Center,
Fax: (413) 545-1249 University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003