[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#2500: emacs and architecture dependencies

Juergen Menden writes ("Bug#2500: emacs and architecture dependencies"):
> i'm not sure if this is better or worse. what is the advantage
> of adding such a field in the control file?

It allows dpkg to prevent you from installing a package intended for
one architecture on a system which has a different architecture.
Doing this by mistake could make your system badly broken ...

The control file architecture name should be the one printed by
`dpkg --print-architecture'.


PS: Ian Murdock removed from the CC list.

Reply to: