[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Proposal for a new debian.control field
To
: Ian Jackson <
ian@chiark.chu.cam.ac.uk
>, Debian_Devel <
debian-devel@Pixar.com
>,
Dirk.Eddelbuettel@qed.econ.queensu.ca
Subject
: Re: Proposal for a new debian.control field
From
:
bruce@Pixar.com
(Bruce Perens)
Date
: Sun, 10 Mar 96 15:19 PST
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
m0tvuOb-0005tRC@mongo.pixar.com
>
I think pre-depends (with a dependency on a kernel package) would satisfy this. Bruce --
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Bruce Perens (on-list)
Bruce Perens (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Proposal for a new debian.control field
From:
Carl V Streeter <streeter@cae.wisc.edu>
Prev by Date:
Bug#2493: GCC -O3 produces unsatisfied external ref to static function
Next by Date:
ELF equivalent for termcap.h?
Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal for a new debian.control field
Next by thread:
Re: Proposal for a new debian.control field
Index(es):
Date
Thread