Bug#2329: Xpm4.7 -- Missing control fields
In message <[🔎] 9602131619.AA01486@mailgate.eur.nl>, Erick Branderhorst writes:
>would be nice in this package (or am I mistaken?)
I don't think this would DTRT, since the package 'xpm' was a.out
(though I suppose one could make it both provide and conflict, but I
don't see that that would buy us anything), and we're not providing an
a.out version of the xpm library.
What someone needs to is create an xpm-compat package with the a.out
libs and _that_ should provide xpm.
IMHO, of course.
"I never worry, why should I. It's all gonna fade."