Re: Manpage for program without manpage
Kai Henningsen writes ("Re: Manpage for program without manpage"):
> firstname.lastname@example.org [...]:
> > \-\- does not have a useful manpage. Please do not report this as a
> > bug, as this might have been done many times. Instead, if you are a
> Please do not report this as a bug; that you get this "ersatz" manpage
> shows that we already know.
Right. I don't think we should use the `ersatz' manpage without
having at least one outstanding bug report about it.
So, the `undocumented' or whatever manpage should say
`This has already been reported as a bug; when a manpage becomes
available it will be included, and the bug report closed.'
or some such.