Re: groff inquiry
On Mon, 4 Apr 1994, Matt Welsh wrote:
> email@example.com (Daniel Quinlan) writes:
> > I think including these links is a *bad* idea for a number of reasons:
> > . Programs are not equivalent and, in some cases, behave radically
> > different, from non-GNU troff packages.
> Some programs just look for "troff" and don't care what they find.
> If you have any instances of this, consider using links, but otherwise
> don't include them.
Groff has a -C flag for compatibility for nroff - it stops it complaining
about various things. Rather than a link, you'll need a small shell script
groff -C $*
I don't know about the other formatters, but I would guess that the same
I favour having something there that will work most of the time rather than
nothing - which will work none of the time, of course.
Charlie Brady * (W) firstname.lastname@example.org * (H) email@example.com
"Make it as simple as possible - | Tel: (02) 413 6838 ____Telectronics__| /\__
but no simpler" Einstein, A | Fax: (02) 413 6868 Pacing Systems \/