[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: infinitetux_1.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED




On January 1, 2020 11:18:54 PM UTC, Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> wrote:
>Hello Bastian,
>
>Am 02.01.20 um 00:00 schrieb Bastian Blank:
>> 
>> Our hard working trainees left the following note:
>> 
>> A lack of a license does not make a project "public domain", it makes
>in non-distributable.
>
>
>Thanks for moving this project forward.
>
>However this statement is certainly not true because the original
>license.txt can still be downloaded from
>
>https://web.archive.org/web/20120522161544/http://www.mojang.com/notch/mario/release.zip
>
>You can verify it yourself.
>
>> The license text for "public-domain" is a summary of an opinion
>
>No it isn't. debian/copyright is correct. Since when is a project that
>was granted to the public domain non-distributable? It is also correct
>to relicense the software to GPL-3+.
>
>> I did not attempt to process further, but more issues may exist. 
>
>Please check the package again. The sources can also be found at
>
>https://salsa.debian.org/games-team/infinitetux/
>
>Please advise how we shall proceed.
>
>Regards,
>
>Markus

There's also this from README.markdown that I would think is concerning:

"I've replaced all of the proprietary artwork with stuff I created or downloaded"

It seems that upstream thinks that if they downloaded artwork off the internet somewhere, that makes it freely licensed.  Those probably all need checking to see what's distributable and what's not.

Scott K


Reply to: