[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Section 6 vs Section 1?



Hi Olek,

On 01.05.2014 03:21, Olek wrote:
[...]
> My question: since this was not done previously, is there some reason to
> NOT put a package such as this into games? Is there an exception for
> servers? Upstream is not aware of any reason for Section 1 vs Section 6
> but I wanted to ask here. If there's a reason for the package to stay in
> Section 1 then it'll save me a bunch of work ;) but I ultimately want to
> do the Right Thing. Thoughts?

There is no exception for servers as long as the server is part of a
game which is the case here. I think moving the man pages from section 1
to 6 is the right thing to do.

I am not completely sure how much you are involved in the maintenance of
the other worldforge packages. Do you know the reason why they can't
migrate to testing? As far as I know Vincent Cheng offered help with
sponsoring and there was also a sponsorship offer from a BSP in
Salzburg. So what is the blocker here? Is there anything that can be
done to fix those open RC bugs?

Regards,

Markus

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: