On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 03:30:38AM -0700, Vincent Cheng wrote: > Due to the above, I'm going to be watching the progress of > Unteralterbach's packaging very closely in the coming months, as well > as opposing this every step of the way. If this actually makes it into > the NEW queue, I have no hesitation on raising this issue again on > -devel and -project, and/or all other steps available to me as a DD to > oppose this (e.g. on the remote chance that this actually passes > through the NEW queue, I'll forward this issue to the tech-ctte, and > sponsor a GR to get Unteralterbach removed from the archive if need > be). To save you time there, I'll point out now that I don't believe the TC has any authority to rule on this question. There is no technical question here, only political and legal ones. The correct avenues of appeal are to the ftp masters, the DPL, and the project through a GR. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature