[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]


On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:

> That's true. Given the fact that there aren't any applications depending
> on 1.6, simply updating the sfml source package to version 2 should suffice.


> That sounds good. Christoph Egger is the current uploader of sfml but I
> think he wouldn't refuse an offer for help. Even if the c and python
> bindings won't work anymore (at least for a while), I think it makes
> sense to move on with SFML 2, so that a real application can benefit
> from it.

I looked at the upstream websites for these a while ago and it seems
they support SFML 2 now so just an upstream update is needed.



Reply to: