Re: SFML2

[Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>]

On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:

> That's true. Given the fact that there aren't any applications depending
> on 1.6, simply updating the sfml source package to version 2 should suffice.

Agreed.

> That sounds good. Christoph Egger is the current uploader of sfml but I
> think he wouldn't refuse an offer for help. Even if the c and python
> bindings won't work anymore (at least for a while), I think it makes
> sense to move on with SFML 2, so that a real application can benefit
> from it.

I looked at the upstream websites for these a while ago and it seems
they support SFML 2 now so just an upstream update is needed.

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise