On Tue, 2012-01-03 at 10:54 -0500, Clark C. Evans wrote: > It seems that the FSF has endorsed CC0, which has not only > a public domain statement but also a permissive license for > as a backup license. The OSI also seems to like this license > and is looking at approving it. Perhaps the author could be > convinced to use the CC0 dedication / license? > > Clark > Possibly, and I've hinted at this in comments left on the content page, but for me to actively seek out and request a re-license like this I'd like to know that it is clearly required, as well. One reason being that if it's tagged as PD, I guess the author expects not to be pestered about it too much license-wise :) -- Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part