[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Standardizing various games packaging things across distros



On Wed, 4 May 2011 23:18:25 +0200
Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 16:48, Bas Wijnen <wijnen@debian.org> wrote:
> 
> > I know of people who have an account set up
> > like that exactly because they don't want to play games while
> > studying. (So for study, they log in as the non-game account, but
> > for leisure, they log in as their "normal" account.
> 
> Seriously? I always wondered if there's anybody who is using this
> distinction.
> 
> Personally, I have always thought that separate directories are a bad
> idea. There is no /bin/X/ or /bin/networking , either. And for good
> reason.

Actually, there is a /usr/bin/X11/ (its a symlink to . though)

> Overall, I prefer Fedora's approach. Maybe it's worth bouncing this
> off of debian-devel to get more input? _If_ this is changed, it should
> be changed globally, preferably at the same time for a lot of packages
> at once and become a release goal for next stable.

I can see benefits to moving the games into /usr/share with other
'stuff', but i'm not convinced we should be moving the binaries to work
around fedoras $PATH deficiencies. (OTOH, if we move the data files and
the temporary files, the binaries are in a special dir for no apparent
reason. In which case I wouldn't object to moving them)
thanks,
kk

-- 
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: