Re: RFS: 0ad
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 06:04:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> > from the replies I've seen so far, it seems that embedding Spidermonkey
> > code in 0 A.D.'s source is a no-no, or at least strongly discouraged.
>
> Maybe porting to another JavaScript engine (like Google V8) is the best
> long-term solution?
It seems to be asking a lot of upstream. Is there a likelyhood for any other
package to make use of the old spidermonkey version (when it is old, that is)?
I'd expect not, and so I'd think using the bundled version was the sensible
choice.
--
Jon Dowland
Reply to: