[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Libraries only provides .a, no .so - Bullet physics engine

On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:17:19PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/5/23 Ivan Vucica <ivucica@gmail.com>:
> > I'd go for just .a, and just a -dev package. I don't feel that every
> > single library has to be made into a .so (there's a library I
> > developed, and I don't intend to .so-ify it at all).
> The advantages of shared objects over static libraries are really
> huge, and at some point it would be important to soify them. I plan to
> do that with that library at least. I'm just a bit concerned about if
> this is the time to do it, not about whether it should be done.

Maybe it's time to reopen our ToolsDiscuss page on the wiki:



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: