Re: Libraries only provides .a, no .so - Bullet physics engine
2008/5/23 Ivan Vucica <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> I'd go for just .a, and just a -dev package. I don't feel that every
> single library has to be made into a .so (there's a library I
> developed, and I don't intend to .so-ify it at all).
The advantages of shared objects over static libraries are really
huge, and at some point it would be important to soify them. I plan to
do that with that library at least. I'm just a bit concerned about if
this is the time to do it, not about whether it should be done.