Hi,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 05:48:39PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> I thought it would be nice to have a checklist so that when packaging
> a game we can have some kind of indicator on its status, and also so
> we don't forget things. What do you think about this idea? Please feel
> free to improve it!
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Games/Checklist
Good idea. I made some minor changes, which I think are uncontested.
But I'll mention them anyway so people can complain if I'm wrong:
- I advised to build all data from source. I noted that all sources
must be in the package, even if not used for building.
- I removed "binaries can go to /usr/bin", and things about /usr/lib. I
proposed before to use /usr/games and
/usr/{share,lib}/games/<packagename>/ (which are optional according to
the FHS) in Debian. I'm still proposing. If you all agree, I think
we should make it a formal policy proposal. It would be best if the
team would do the proposal, I think. If I don't hear complaints soon,
I'll write a formulation for it. Feel free to be faster. :-)
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature