Re: RFC: A truly cross-distro game packaging list (was: Re: Chromium BSU upstream developers needed!)
- To: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
- Cc: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>, debian-devel-games <debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org>, fedora-games-list@redhat.com, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, Michael Sterrett <mr_bones_@gentoo.org>, Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org>, Stefan Schweizer <genstef@gentoo.org>, Tristan Heaven <nyhm@gentoo.org>, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>, Brandon Barnes <winterknight@nerdshack.com>, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@gmail.com>, Ramsey Haddad <witchinghour@users.sourceforge.net>, Colin Leroy <colinleroy@users.sourceforge.net>, "Mark B. Allan" <mallanmba@yahoo.com>
- Subject: Re: RFC: A truly cross-distro game packaging list (was: Re: Chromium BSU upstream developers needed!)
- From: Gerfried Fuchs <rhonda@deb.at>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:24:33 +0100
- Message-id: <20080318092433.GB27374@asteria.debian.or.at>
- Mail-followup-to: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>, Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>, debian-devel-games <debian-devel-games@lists.debian.org>, fedora-games-list@redhat.com, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, Michael Sterrett <mr_bones_@gentoo.org>, Alfredo Tupone <tupone@gentoo.org>, Stefan Schweizer <genstef@gentoo.org>, Tristan Heaven <nyhm@gentoo.org>, Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@gentoo.org>, Brandon Barnes <winterknight@nerdshack.com>, Brian Redfern <brianwredfern@gmail.com>, Ramsey Haddad <witchinghour@users.sourceforge.net>, Colin Leroy <colinleroy@users.sourceforge.net>, "Mark B. Allan" <mallanmba@yahoo.com>
- In-reply-to: <2d460de70803180156i63f05e3bhc2bd9e524760b2dc@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <2d460de70803180156i63f05e3bhc2bd9e524760b2dc@mail.gmail.com>
* Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> [2008-03-18 09:56:23 CET]:
> 1) Debian servers (will find out if that is OK)
Would be definitely o.k., but I follow your reasoning of that it would
sound too much Debian specific and thus should rather be avoided to not
discourage other people to join in.
> 2) Private Domain
Would mean a maintenance overhead which isn't really needed, there is
enough of offers flying around.
> 3) berlios.de et al
... personally I would suggest gna.org from which I like the offerings
quite well. It's savannah from the FSF France which in my opinion is
pretty much more libre than savannah itself. It feels more comfortable
to me - but I'm not against a particular site, only I do dislike the
sf.net mailinglist advertising immensly, especially when it sends me
microsoft ads. %-/
So long,
Rhonda
Reply to: