On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 04:16:43PM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Yup, but is it worth moving forward to support XDG?
In case I wasn't clear in my previous e-mail: I think we should. But I
think (as everyone else I've heard so far) it's not a good idea to fork
for this. So only for the games where we are effectively upstream
already (at least for the user-settings parts).
> I never heard of it before today either, but if it comes from
> freedesktop it might make sense.
In case it makes any difference to you, pioneers is using the XDG
approach for some time already. We got a bug report about it ("Why
isn't your data in ~/.pioneers?"), but for the rest it works fine. :-)
And I'm certainly in favour of reducing dot{files,directories}.
Thanks,
Bas
--
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://pcbcn10.phys.rug.nl/e-mail.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature