Re: Preferred licences for audio data
Matthew Johnson <debian@matthew.ath.cx> wrote:
> So, does debian-legal have any suggestions for the most appropriate
> licence for audio data which is DFSG-compatible? [...]
I would suggest:
1. the same licence as the rest of the software, maybe with additional
permissions for performance and recording;
2. the MIT/Expat licence;
3. the GPL (the definition of Programs is smart enough to cope),
maybe with additional permissions;
4. the Design Science License or Free Art License (I think... note
GPL-incompatibility);
[...]
> Finally, if we were to ship the game without any levels is it still
> suitable for main (I'm guessing not, since quake2 is in contrib and in a
> similar case)? [...]
I doubt it. It depends if it does anything useful without levels.
Hope that helps,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Reply to: