Re: oolite 1.65-1 crashes on startup - fixed - Please upload oolite and oolite-data
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 26/07/06, Eddy Petrişor <eddy.petrisor@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > =====
>> > $ COLUMNS=80 dpkg -l|grep oolite
>> > ii oolite 1.65-1 The space-sim game Oolite ported
>> to GNUStep/
>> > ii oolite-data 1.62-5-1 Data files for the space-sim game
>> Oolite
>> > =====
>> >
>> > Anything lese you need to debugg this?
>>
>> Ooops, I forgot to update the data package. The changes made in
>> upstream introduced some incompatibilities, AFAIK.
>>
>> Sorry. I'll update the data package, too, then aska again ('though it
>> should be failry trivial to update). I don't expect that more than
>> compiling the oolite-data package against the new sources, but if the
>> incompatibility is true, then oolite should conflict oolite-data (<
>> 1.65-1).
> Oh, and depend on oolite-data (>=1.65-1), too
>
Now is done. I have tested the 1.65-1 oolite package with oolite-data
1.62-5-1 and indeed it crashes. It does not with -data 1.65-1. All other
combinations work, so if oolite-data 1.65-1 enters faster than oolite
there's no problem.
I have changed the oolite depends on -data and appended (>= 1.65-1) to
it, and tagged oolite trunk as 1.65-2. I did not rebuild oolite. It
should be built with "-v1.65-1" added to the {svn|dpkg}-buildpackage
command line in order to get the closes in that section, too.
Oolite-data is tagged, too (1.65-1)
Please make a dual upload (i386, powerpc) of oolite and also upload the
data package.
(As I said, I didn't build 1.65-2, but I don't see any reason for it to
be different, since I only added a versioned dependency).
TIA
- --
Regards,
EddyP
=============================================
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEyflDY8Chqv3NRNoRAptdAJ9uW8M8tNKuMj8ge8oMWJLI8Xd6pwCgig0e
ktDnRf7kHtkP01xXItRW1KM=
=32vv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: