Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > your estimate of 50% spam is too high IMHO It's not, see: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/story/0,,t277-s2135445,00.html > only 40% of measured spam actually came from one of the listed servers. For my @debian.org address, it's much more than 50%, see: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg00775.html