Re: Every spam is sacred
Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> writes:
> They have said "no" using (more or less) the following reasoning:
> Since Debian machines have been listed in several DNSBLs in the past,
> we should not use ANY of them ourselves (which is like saying: since
> we have sent tons of spam in the past via our mailing lists, we should
> accept ALL the spam we receive). Does somebody understand this?
I would phrase it differently: Nowadays, DNSBLs are mainly used to
enforce certain policies regarding ISP behavior at the cost of
interrupting mail communication. IMHO, this isn't an acceptable deal,
and I don't support blacklists by using them (even for marking
messages).
Reply to: